Recognizing Where You Hold Yourself Back as a writer

I’ve been working on a first draft of what I plan will become my third novel, while simultaneously working on some poetry for a future collection.

I usually write like this, bouncing between two different forms at the same time.

At the start of the year, I signed up for one of Erica Anzalone’s Witch Lit courses to help me generate some new ideas through the lens of witchcraft-related writings. It was a great experience that I got a lot out of.

One thing I didn’t expect to come up, however, was self-reflection upon my own processes.

Specifically the realization about how much I hold myself back in my long-form fiction.

When I write poetry or essays, I feel free. I go right into my truths, and my horrors. Sure, I play with language and experiment, especially as a poet. But I never feel confined by rules. I never think about “story arcs” or structure or conflict.

I don’t ask myself, “What’s motivating this character?” the way I do when I’m working on my novel.

My first novel, PostApoc, was a freeing creative experience. I took inspiration from William S. Burroughs and tried cut-up methods. I worked spells and poems into the greater narrative. I wrote certain scenes as though they were dreams, trying to replicate the unreliable narration we experience when asleep.

My second novel, The Mouth is a Coven, was less wild in its approach, though the language and tone still stayed poetic. But it’s still a more straightforward read, with a linear storyline and clearer structure.

Building a world around the long-form structure of beginning, middle and end is something I’m interested in doing as a writer. While I like my first two novels, I feel I’ve yet to hit my stride as a novelist. It’s a goal of mine to improve my craft in this area.

As I’m working on my current draft – a novel based on an apartment I lived in when I was in my mid-20s – I find myself circling around the same questions I’ve had before:

“Is this too weird?”
“Am I telling too much?”
“Is it okay to reveal this information to the reader?”

In my previous two novels, I was more concerned with the execution of language, and the experimentation within that. And I think that’s where experimental fiction can hide a lot: It’s not just about the story, but all of the components that create it.

Real life is strange on its own, and sometimes things happen in a certain way, and in a certain order, that can’t be explained. And yet as I attempt to write something based, in part, on some of my real-life experiences, I keep being haunted by the “rules” of writing.

I keep questioning whether I’m being clever enough, or whether I’m writing strong enough sentences. I keep wanting to dig into the emotional states of my narrator, but I wonder if I’m giving away too much by doing so.

I recognize that I need to simply give myself over to the work and let it come out as it wants to. I can edit it later, I know.

One thing that is helping is I’ve been writing this novel entirely by hand in spiral notebooks. I haven’t drafted a novel this way before and it’s preventing me from going back and editing prematurely.

Which is good, I think, given that I keep questioning what I’m putting down as I go.

But knowing now how to identify my hesitancy gives me power over those moments where I hold myself back.

At least I hope so.

What do you do when you feel like you’re holding back in your writing?

Previous
Previous

check out my interview on the 1980s now podcast!

Next
Next

montreal, 2004